0
INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS DAY

INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS DAY

By: Nneka Oduada Eze (Esq)

THEME: EQUALITY – REDUCING INEQUALITIES, ADVANCING HUMAN RIGHTS.

Introduction:

The concepts of “human rights” were originally embedded in the concept of natural law, which are the principles of natural right and wrong. In a wide sense, natural law gave birth to the idea of natural rights and natural justice. Thus, it is the idea of natural law which influenced the French Revolution and the American Constitution.[1]

At the international level, the development of the concept of human rights was late as the idea of human rights existed at varying degrees for different periods of time, within some national legal systems and in relation to certain specific topics. Therefore, one of the fundamental achievements of the United Nations is the creation of a comprehensive body of human rights law which serves as a universal and internationally protected code to which all nations can subscribe and all people aspire.

The United Nations has defined a broad range of these internationally accepted rights, including civil, cultural, economic, political and social rights. It has also established mechanisms to promote and protect these rights and to assist states in carrying out their responsibilities.

The foundations of this body of law are the charter of the United Nations and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights[2], adopted by the United Nations General Assembly in 1945 and 1948, respectively.  Since then, the United Nations has gradually expanded human rights law to encompass specific standards for women, children, persons with disabilities, minorities and other vulnerable groups, who now possess rights that protect them from discrimination that had long been common in many societies[3].

WHAT ARE HUMAN RIGHTS?

Human rights are rights inherent to all human beings, regardless of race, sex, nationality, ethnicity, language, religion, or any other status. Human rights include the right to life and liberty, freedom from slavery and torture, freedom of opinion and expression, the right to work and education, and many more.  Everyone is entitled to these rights, without discrimination.[4]

Human rights are standards that recognize and protect the dignity of all human beings. Human rights govern how individual human beings live in society and with each other, as well as their relationship with the State and the obligations that the State have towards them. Human rights are universal and inalienable. All people everywhere in the world are entitled to them. No one can voluntarily give them up. Nor can others take them away from him or her. 

In the Nigerian context, human rights are fundamental rights as contained in chapter iv of the 1999 constitution (as amended) and fundamental rights have been various defined as per ESO JSC in the case of Ransome-Kuti v. A.G Federation[5] as follows;

Fundamental right is a right which stands above the ordinary laws of the land and which in fact is antecedent to the political society itself. It is a primary condition to a civilized existence and what has been done by our constitutions since independence….. is to have these rights enshrined in the constitution so that the rights could be “immutable to the extent of the no immutability” of the constitution itself

2021 INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS DAY:

The theme for 2021 international human rights day is EQUALITYReducing Inequalities, Advancing Human Rights. The theme relates to ‘Equality’ which is embodied under Article 1 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which provides that:

All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood”.[6]

All individuals are equal as human beings and by virtue of the inherent dignity of each human person. All human beings are entitled to their human rights without discrimination of any kind, such as race, color, sex, ethnicity, age, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, disability, property, birth or other status as explained by the human rights treaty bodies.  In Nigeria, human rights are constitutionally guaranteed under Chapter IV of the constitution.[7]

PRESENT STATE OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN NIGERIA

As the world celebrates the 2021 international human rights day, there is need to recap on how human rights have been in Nigeria in recent times, below are some of the major events in recent times:

For weeks in October 2020, young Nigerians held nationwide protest  denouncing years of extra-judicial killings, torture and other ill-treatment by officers of the Special Anti-Robbery Squad (SARS)[8] unit of the Nigeria Police Force (NPF). These youth-led protests were organized under the banner of End-SARS and quickly gained international support as part of the global movement for the recognition that Black lives matter everywhere.

End-SARS also became an avenue for young people to voice dissatisfaction with the bad governance that has contributed to Nigerian officials’ widespread lack of accountability for misbehavior.  The protests ended abruptly on 20 October 2020 when security forces shot at peaceful protesters[9] at Lekki toll gate in Lagos, reportedly killing some persons and injuring many others. Widespread looting and property damage ensued[10], and curfews were declared in several states.

In response to the protests, President Muhammadu Buhari disbanded SARS and promised extensive police reform. Judicial Panels of Inquiry[11] were also set up to investigate allegations of police brutality, including the toll gate incident, and make recommendations for restitution to the government. These, however, are only the most recent in a long line of attempts at addressing human rights violations within the broader context of police reform in Nigeria.  

Sadly, as fundamental and inalienable as human rights are, the rate at which same is grossly abused, especially by the law enforcement agencies (Nigerian police force in particular) cannot be overemphasized. It is so heart trenching that the respect for human right by the law enforcement agencies (particularly the police) is relatively poor in Nigeria. A clear evidence of such played our before, during and the aftermath of the end-sars protest that took place in 2020 and extensively 2021. Since the protest, nothing has changed and it appears that we as a nation are yet to learn from the daring consequences of the dangers of the consistent and blatant abuse of the rights of each citizen. It is also pitiable that the government has made a U-turn to discredit the findings of the Judicial Panel of Inquiry and out rightly rejected the findings therein.

RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSION

The issues of fundamental rights enforcement have continued to feature prominently in our courts as there is increasing consciousness in Nigeria of the sanctity and need to protect fundamental rights. The chief justice of Nigeria is empowered to make/amend the fundamental rights (enforcement procedure rules). This duty is conferred upon the chief justice by virtue of the provisions of the constitution[12]. The amendment of the fundamental rights (enforcement procedure rules) is long overdue. However, for something as fundamental and crucial as this rule that prescribes the procedure of enforcing a person’s fundamental right in Nigeria is, it is being delayed without any justification as to what is hindering the amendment.

Furthermore, the Federal high court recently came up with the idea of payment of cost relating to enforcement of fundamental right actions where there is a delay in filing a process within a particular time frame. In as much as there is the need to dispense with actions speedily as justice delayed is justice denied, this action can be likened to the Federal High Court back-flipping our adjudication of justice system to the past administration. This is not supposed to be the case as rules making the process of obtaining justice seamless/effortless, not making it a herculean task.

Although it is understandable that a lot of litigants uses the institution of enforcement of fundamental right enforcement as a shield in protecting them from certain wrong they have committed and sometimes reluctantly pursuing the action to the just conclusion of same timeously, it is however the age long principle that instead of one innocent person to suffer wrongly for an offence, it is better to let ten guilty persons go free. Those trying to ensure that their rights are preserved and not infringed upon should not be made to suffer for the wrong doing of others.

In conclusion, human rights are inalienable rights that accrue to every citizen of a country and one that deserves the maximum unhindered protection from infringement. It should always be guarded jealously as the respect for human rights is the bedrock of every civilized economy. Those in power  are duty bound to ensure that they tackle the root causes of gross abuse of human rights which give rise to conflict and crisis, by addressing grievances, eliminating inequalities and exclusion and allowing people to participate in decision-making that affect their lives and they should make conscious visible effort of safeguarding the fundamental rights of its citizens. It is our hope as a Nation that 2022 will be a year worth remembering especially with respect to the enforcement and safeguarding of each individuals fundamental human rights.


[1] Professor Kehinde Mowoe: Constitutional Law in Nigeria, Malthouse Law Books (2008) p269

[2] https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights. Assessed on December 10, 2021

[3] https://www.un.org/en/global-issues/human-rights. Assessed on December 10, 2021

[4] Supra, note 2.

[5] (1985) 2 NWLR , 211 SCN

[6] https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights. Assessed on December 10, 2021

[7] See chapter IV, particularly sections 33-44 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as amended).

[8] https://www.aljazeera.com/features/2020/10/22/sars-a-brief-history-of-a-rogue-unit. Assessed on December 10, 2021

[9] https://edition.cnn.com/202/11/21/africa/nigeria-shooting-lekki-toll-gate-intl/index. Assessed on December 10, 2021

[10] https://www.premiumtimesng.com/news/headlines/422983-how-hoodlums-took-advantage-of-endsars-wreaked-havoc-in-Lagos.html (Assessed on December 10, 2021)

[11] https://eie.ng/weekly-updates-on-endsars. Assessed on December 10, 2021

[12] Section 46 (3) of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as amended)

0
FG Moves to Accelerate Open Disclosure Of Nigeria’s Oil, Gas Assets’ Ownership

FG Moves to Accelerate Open Disclosure Of Nigeria’s Oil, Gas Assets’ Ownership

By: Emmanuel Adefeso ESQ

The federal government has officially launched the Opening Extractives Programme (OEP), a global five-year scheme to unveil the real owners of assets in Nigeria’s oil, gas and mining sectors. The initiative was introduced to accelerate progress of beneficial ownership transparency in selected resource-rich countries and to be jointly implemented by the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) and Open Ownership,

The Minister of Finance, Budget, and National Planning, Dr. Zainab Ahmed, who delivered the keynote during the event organised by the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (NEITI) in Abuja, said it would help stem corruption and money laundering in the sectors. Ahmed explained that having been selected as one of the pilot countries for beneficial ownership, NEITI at the time developed the first set of templates used to gather information and data on who the real owners of Nigeria’s extractive assets were, but met with brick walls at every turn. With the launch of the programme, she stated that Nigeria has now fully institutionalized beneficial ownership reporting, thus moving away from the experimental stage and providing for sanctions for defaulters.

The Executive Secretary, NEITI, Dr. Ogbonnaya Orji, in his remarks, stressed that the programme was a global initiative to support national governments to deepen implementation of beneficial ownership transparency, saying that though its execution may be difficult, it was doable. According to him, secrecy in corporate ownership of assets in the extractive industries remained a clear danger to countries everywhere in the world. It creates a real and present danger to our collective development aspirations, especially in all developing countries. But what is most gratifying is that governments in developed and developing nations are coming together to strategise on how best to lift the veil of secrecy over the ownership of extractive assets in most of the resource-rich countries.

The initiative will go a long way in assuring all invaluable stakeholders of a transparent, cost efficient, safe, and sustainable framework, for the management of Nigeria’ hydrocarbon resources, in the best interest of the country, investors and in line with global best practice. The long term gain of this initiative are that citizens will be aware of who they are doing business with or competing against and will also encourage appropriate stakeholder engagement which is a part of Nigeria’s open government action plan. It is a step in the right direction for the implementation of global standards for the promotion of an open and accountable system in the management of extractive resources in Nigeria.

Disclaimer: This news update is intended only to provide general information and does not by itself constitute or serve as legal advice. For further information, we are available to provide detailed legal advice. For more information contact us on info@asalawpractice.org or call 0908 482 0000, 0806 749 8777

0
Whatsapp Privacy Policy

Nigerian Bar Association published an article titled “Data Protection: Whatsapp Privacy Policy Changes and the Primacy of Consent under Nigeria Data Protection Regulatory Framework” by T.A.M Damiari Esq in her Nigerian Bar Journal (2021) 11, Issue 2, pp. 1-16.


The article interrogates the latest Whatsapp policy in the light of Constitutional, regulatory and institutional frameworks whilst beckoning on the regulator to halt the further implementation of the policy in the Nigerian cyber space.


Copies of the Journal may be obtained from the Nigerian Bar Association headquarters and designated book shops and stands.

0
MTN, AIRTEL GET CBN’S APPROVAL TO OPERATE PAYMENT SERVICE BANK

NEWS UPDATE: MTN, AIRTEL GET CBN’S APPROVAL TO OPERATE PAYMENT SERVICE BANK

By: Emmanuel Adefeso ESQ

The Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) has granted approval in principle to MTN and Airtel to operate payment service bank (PSB) across the country, aimed at further driving financial inclusion in Nigeria.

Announcing the approval, MTN in a statement signed by the Company’s Secretary, Uto Ukpanah, said: “MTN Nigeria Communications Plc. (MTN Nigeria) as promoter, received an Approval in Principle (AIP) dated 4 November 2021 from the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) for a licence application for the proposed MoMo Payment Service Bank Limited. This is the first step in the process towards a final approval, subject to the fulfillment of certain conditions as stipulated by the CBN. The decision to issue a final approval is firmly within the regulatory purview of the CBN and we respect their right and judgment in that regard.” MTN Nigeria therefore affirmed its commitment towards the financial inclusion agenda of the CBN and the federal republic of Nigeria to continue to explore means whereby it can contribute to its fulfillment”.

Also, Airtel announced the approval CBN granted it to operate PSB, through a statement signed by the Group Company Secretary, Simon O’Hara, said: “Airtel Africa, with presence in 14 countries across Africa, announces that its subsidiary SmartCash Payment Services Bank Limited has been granted approval in principle to operate a payment service bank business in Nigeria. Final approval is subject to the Group satisfying certain standard conditions within six months.”

It would be recalled that the CBN had in the last quarter of 2018 unveiled the operational guidelines for PSBs. Therefore, the approval in principle granted to MTN and Airtel are in furtherance of the CBN’s mandate of promoting a sound financial system and enhancing access to financial services for low income earners and unbanked segments of the society. The PSBs are to operate mostly in the rural areas and unbanked locations, targeting financially excluded persons, with not less than 25 per cent financial service touch points in such rural areas as defined by the CBN from time to time.

Therefore the decision to grant PSB approvals to the two major telecommunications firms in Nigeria is in line with the apex banks objective of enhancing financial inclusion and the development of the payment system through a secured technology-driven environment.  Indeed, the operation of payment service bank (PSB) across the country will undoubtedly enhance financial inclusion in rural areas by increasing access to deposit products and payment/remittance services to small businesses, low-income households and other entities through high-volume low-value transactions in a secured technology-driven environment.

Disclaimer: This news update is intended only to provide general information and does not by itself constitute or serve as legal advice. For further information, we are available to provide detailed legal advice. For more information contact us on info@asalawpractice.org or call 0908 482 0000, 0806 749 8777

0
EDO JUDICIARY LAUNCHES MULTI-DOOR COURT WEBSITE

EDO JUDICIARY LAUNCHES MULTI-DOOR COURT WEBSITE AND ONLINE DISPUTES RESOLUTION PLATFORM

By: Emmanuel Adefeso (Esq)

In its bid to ensure an effective justice delivery system, the Edo State Judiciary has launched the Edo State Multi-Door Court website and the Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) platform in the state. The newly sworn-in Chief Judge of the state, Justice Joe Acha, who launched the platform, said that the website was designed to enhance economic development for the citizens of Edo State through ease and effective justice delivery.

Justice Acha stated further that the Online Dispute Resolution platform is suited for commercial disputes which disputants can use to clearly elucidate their interests giving the neutral, more lucid and speedier path to assisting them reach resolution and simultaneously enhancing contract enforcement in Edo state. Also speaking, the functioning Director, Edo State Multi-Door Court

(ESMDC), Mrs Osazemen Olubunmi Achebo said that the goal of the ESMDC was to serve as a vital complement to the existing litigation and justice delivery framework in the judiciary. Mrs. Achebo explained that the online dispute resolution was positioned to project and offer to the general public enhanced, timely, cost effective, and user friendly routes to justice.

Indeed alternative dispute resolution processes are quick, simple, inexpensive and technicality-free processes for the resolution of disputes. They operate side by side with the regular courts as alternatives to litigation because the introduction of multi-door courthouses has revolutionized alternative dispute resolution processes by integrating them into the regular court system. Under the Multi-Door Court House System, settlement agreements and awards reached through arbitration, conciliation and mediation are enforceable as judgments of the High Court. Therefore, the launch of the Edo State Multi-Door Court website and the official takeoff of its Online Dispute Resolution Platform are commendable as it will serve as a vital complement to the existing litigation and justice delivery framework in the judiciary. No doubt, the website will offer to the general public enhanced, timely, cost effective, and user friendly routes to justice, particularly, in the face of the Covid-19 pandemic.

Disclaimer: This news update is intended only to provide general information and does not by itself constitute or serve as legal advice. For further information, we are available to provide detailed legal advice. For more information contact us on info@asalawpractice.org or call 0908 482 0000, 0806 749 8777

1 13 14 15 16 17 25