0

NEWS UPDATE – EXTENSION OF DEADLINE FOR COMPANIES WITH UNISSUED SHARE CAPITAL BY THE CORPORATE AFFAIRS COMMISSION

By: Nneka Oduada Eze Esq.

The Corporate Affairs Commission on 16th April, 2021, published a public notice to all Existing Companies, Esteemed Customers and the General Public. The information contained therein is that the Minister of Industry, Trade and Investment has approved an amendment to Regulation 13 of the Companies Regulations, 2021 allowing an extension to the period for complying with the requirements of issued share capital under Section 124 of the Companies and Allied Matters Act 2020 (CAMA) by Existing Companies with unissued share capital up to 31st December 2022.

The said Regulation 13, of the Companies Regulation, 2021, (that provided for the Minimum Issued Share Capital of Existing Companies-now amended) previously provides as follows:

1. Where, at the commencement of the Act, a company has unissued shares in its capital, the company shall not later than 30th June, 2021 fully issue such shares.

2. Notice of issue delivered to the Commission for registration shall be exempted from payment of filing fees.

3. Where a company to which this regulation applies fails to comply with this regulation, the company and every officer of the company shall be liable to a daily default penalty as prescribed by the Commission.

While the second and third leg of the said Regulation 13 still stands, Existing Companies with unissued share capital are advised to take advantage of the extended period to comply with the requirements of issued share capital under the Section.

All Existing Companies are further advised that in line with the definition of “share capital” in Section 868 of the Companies and Allied Matters Act, 2020 as “the issued share capital of a company at any given time”, any share capital of a Company that shall remain unissued after 31st December 2022 shall not be recognized as forming part of the share capital of the Company until the share capital of the Company is fully issued or reduced accordingly.

The General Public, all Existing Companies and Esteemed Customers were further advised to note that any application filed in compliance with Section 124, CAMA after the extended date shall attract the applicable penalty prescribed under the Section and the Companies Regulations 2021.

0

AMCON ACT AND THE AMCON AMENDMENT BILL

By Paulson Michael Esq.

The AMCON Amendment Bill seeks to give clarity on the provisions in the Act and to enhance AMCON’s debt recovery capabilities thereby improving supporting regimes for enforcement. The Bill is seeking to amend the Act by creating sinking funds required to meet its debt securities.

AMCON was created for the purpose of efficiently resolving the Non-Performing Loan (NPL) assets of Nigerian banks and other related matters. By the AMCON Act 2010 enacted by the National Assembly of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, the corporation is empowered to dispose of managed assets of Nigerian banks.

The amended AMCON Act was enacted on 29th July 2019 and it represents the second amendment of the AMCON Act which comprises of 24 sections. The amended sections are Sections 6, 10, 19, 31, 33, 34, 35, 39, 43, 45, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 55, 60 and 61. In addition to the amended sections of the AMCON Act, new sections were introduced which include Sections 33A, 50A and 50B. Key Features of the Bill

1. Tracing and tracking debtors’ hidden funds. AMCON may place any bank account or any other account related to a debtor under surveillance. All said bank accounts of the individual debtors and their companies will be monitored for the effective tracing and recovery of debts.

2. Naming and shaming recalcitrant debtors and making contracting with government subject to good standing with AMCON.

3. Holding selling EFIs to their loan sale obligations and giving teeth to claw back rights.

4. Checkmating debtors’ legal gymnastics and exploitation of legal technicalities to frustrate recovery.

5. Fast tracking the hearing and determination of AMCON cases. In essence, where a debtor or other party brings an action against AMCON in a competent court, until a final decision is made, no order of attachment can be made against AMCON.

6. Enhancing AMCON’s rights over collateral securing EBAs from securing interest to legal title.

7. Fine-tuning AMCON special powers. Objectives of the Bill To clarify the restrictions placed on the member of the board or any employee of AMCON regarding an involvement in the purchase of assets acquired by AMCON.

1. To clarify the effect of AMCON’s acquisition of Eligible Bank Assets (EBA) from Eligible Financial Institution (EFI), in terms of the powers, rights and obligations of the EFI in relation to the purchased EBA.

2. To ensure that an action in court does not restrict the vesting of an EBA in and the assignment of relevant contracts relating to the EBA to AMCON.

3. To extend the limitation period for any cause of action relating to any debt owed to AMCON by its acquisition of an EBA.

4. To regulate and properly define the powers of a receiver appointed by AMCON for a debtor company whose assets have been charged, mortgaged or pledged as security for an EBA acquired by AMCON.

5. To ensure that AMCON is exempted from the provisions of the Investment and Securities Act (“ISA”), in addition to the Capital Gains Tax Act, Companies Income Tax Act and the Stamp Duties Act; and

6. To establish the Banking Sector Resolution Cost Fund to ensure that AMCON is able to meet its obligations arising from debt securities issued by AMCON pursuant to the AMCON Act and would be utilized if AMCON if AMCON is unable to meet such obligations as and when due from its resources including the proceeds of sale and management of EBA it acquires from EFI.

Section 6 of the AMCON Amendment Bill Act seeks to amend section 60 of the AMCON Act as it relates to the Nigerian Capital market which will not be regulated by the ISA. Section 6 of the AMCON Amendment Bill thus provides that Section 60 will be amended as follows:

a) The deletion of the existing head notes and replacing same with the words Exemptions Granted to the Corporation; and

b) Inserting a new paragraph (c) as follows:

c) Investment and Securities Act”

Section 60 of the AMCON Act prescribes that AMCON is exempted from the application of the Capital Gains Tax Act, the Companies Income Tax Act, and the Stamp Duties Act. The proposed amendment to Section 60 further seeks to exempt AMCON not just from the taxes and transaction fees imposed pursuant to the ISA, but from also complying with the entire provisions of the ISA. This total exemption is not advisable because the ISA makes provision for the rules and laws that govern and regulate the capital Market. AMCON is an issuer primarily in bonds and is also potentially a major participant in securities lending as stipulated by the AMCON Act, and these activities are extensively regulated by the provisions of the ISA.

Part XV of the ISA deals with the borrowing by the Federal, State and Local Government and their agencies and regulate activities involving bonds. Part X of the ISA deals with the conduct of Securities business, under which securities lending is regulated. To exempt AMCON from the provisions of the ISA will mean that the bonds issued by AMCON will not be regulated by any legislation since the AMCON Act does not have provisions regulating the issuance and dealing in bonds.

The exemption will also make it difficult for the capital market players to deal in AMCON bonds since the players in the capital market will be subject to the ISA whilst AMCON will not. This could lead to conflicting policies regarding actions that can be taken in respect of the AMCON bonds. This is the same situation with securities lending, and this is governed by the ISA, and there are rules issued in respect of securities lending by both the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Exchange.

Based on the foregoing it is suggested that the specific areas in the ISA such as transactional costs, tax and regulatory fees which AMCON wants to be exempted from should be explicitly stated in Section 6 of the AMCON Amendment Bill rather than a blanket exemption from the ISA.

Benefits of the AMCON Amendment Bill

The AMCON Amendment Bill sure has a whole lot of benefits. Additionally, it has created an alternative source of funds which AMCON can utilize to meet its obligations under the AMCON Act. The AMCON Amendment Bill took steps to clarify the scope of AMCON’s powers regarding the acquisition of EBAs.

The aim of the relevant provisions was to ensure that AMCON is able to exercise its powers to achieve the intendment of the Act without unnecessary interference with its ability to do so. The Amendment Bill states that upon AMCON’s acquisition of an EBAs from an EFI, the Eligible Financial Institution’s obligations in relation to the EBA will remain with the EFI whilst AMCON is given the power to exercise rights in relation to the EBA. Additionally the Bill ensures that there are no legal impediments by any action in court restricting the vesting of an EBA in and the assignment of relevant contracts relating to the EBA to AMCON. Furthermore, issues involving statutes of limitation relating to debts owed to AMCON by its acquisition of an EBA has been addressed by the Bill and ensures that for the purposes of the limitation period, time will only begin to run and the cause of action deemed to arise, from the date of the purchase of the EBA.

Finally, the Bill has ensured clarity on the scope, powers and reduces the possibilities of litigation over the same by creating detailed provisions to regulate and properly define the powers of AMCON, where it acts as receiver appointed by AMCON for a debtor company whose assets have been charged, mortgaged or pledged as security for an EBA acquired by AMCON.

Furthermore by the Bill, the Federal Government will have the requisite powers it has to establish the Banking Sector Resolution Cost Fund and would ensure that the funds in the Banking Sector Resolution Cost Fund be utilized by AMCON if AMCOM is unable to meet its obligations at the appropriate time.

The Bill tends to targets debtors that are able but unwilling or refusing to pay and who hide their funds, financial and commercial information away from AMCON to frustrate recovery of the said debt. Section 6(1) (i) (iii) and new Section 50A(1).

By virtue of Section 50A (4) it gives a Comprehensive disapplication of banking secrecy laws and bankers confidentiality rules wherein AMCON may additionally apply to court ex parte to compel compliance and the court except where it sees a good reason to the contrary is required to make order and award cost of a minimum of N 5million. Section 50A (3), Section 6(1) (ua) (i) & (ii), Section 6(1) (ua) (i) & (iii), Section 50A (1), Section 50A (2).

The Directors of defaulting EFI are criminally liable to 3 years imprisonment under the new bill, Surveillance and access to debtors banking, financial and commercial information and BVN from banks by Ex parte order of FHC, access to debtors computer systems for the purpose of locating debtors funds by ex-parte order of the FHC, requiring any EFI by written notice for details of debtor’s bank balances and investments by way of deposits and financial instruments and a fine of N 10m and additional N 50,000 for each day of default. By Virtue of Section 50B(1), 50B(2) it prescribes rules or contractual obligations regarding confidentiality by empowering AMCON to publish a list of recalcitrant debtors in national daily/newspaper together and to furnish procuring entities with copy of published list.

Section 6(6) and new Section 50B (2) imposes an obligation on FG and Federal MDAs to seek AMCON clearance before contracting with or making payments to recalcitrant debtors on the list furnished. The Bill in Section 50B (3) Further prohibits procuring entities from awarding contracts to, or conducting business with, or making payments to debtors in the published list without AMCON’s prior written concurrence, and without satisfying themselves that any condition attached to AMCONs concurrence has been met.

Taking a critical look at Section 31(2), Section 31(7), Section 31(6) Section 31 (3), Section 31(4) and Section 31 (5), AMCON is empowered to demand from selling EFI’s, their directors or officers, delivery of information, books, accounts, records and documents in relation to acquired EBAs, and to make defaulting EFI’s liable upon demand by AMCON, to make a full refund.

It also mandatorily obligates the immediate debit and defaulting EFI the purchase price with interest, Criminalizes failure by directors or officers of EFIs to comply with the demand for delivery or furnishing of false or misleading information, books, accounts, records or documents {6months imprisonment. Furthermore, it also makes power to demand delivery applicable to EBA purchased before the enactment of the 2019 Amendment, and imposes fines in favour of AMCON for failure to comply with the demand for delivery of necessary documents on the acquisition of EBA {fine of N 1million+ N 50,000 for each day of default; EFI, directors and officers are severally liable for delivery of false or misleading information {EFI to pay fine of N10million, Directors/Officers N2million} to AMCON.

In Section 33A, Section 53 (7), Section 34 (6), and Section 35 (5) of the Bill seeks to checkmate debtors’ legal gymnastics and Exploitation of Legal Technicalities grant of immunity to AMCON, its directors and officers against action or proceedings by “reason only” of EBA acquisition and cessation and abatement of any such existing proceedings. The imposition of this condition for grant of stay of proceedings, stay of execution/injunction pending appeal and leave to appeal {all injunctive reliefs will be on condition of the deposit of claimed sum into an interest yielding account in the name of the registry of the relevant court}, Limiting remedy to a debtor to monetary compensation. Total disapplication of the statute of limitation in AMCON debt recovery and debt realization matters {as statute of limitation does not apply to EBAs purchased by AMCON. See the decision in MYEKO NIGERIA LTD v AMCON (2019) LPELR – 47643 CA.

Section 53 (1) and (3) requires the heads of courts, the president of the Court of Appeal and the Chief Judge of Nigeria to issue special practice directions exclusively for the expedited and accelerated hearing of AMCON matters and also Set time limits for the determination of AMCON matters: At the High Court, 6 months from filing fresh action while pending matters same 6 months form enactment of 2019 Amendment} – new Section 53 (3); Court of Appeal & Supreme Court- 60days- new Section 53 (5).

The Bill in Section 53(1) further mandatorily requires heads of courts to designate one or more special courts to exclusively hear and determine AMCON related matters speedily. The Bill further enhanced AMCONs right over collateral securing EBAs from security interest to legal title.

Section 34 (1) (a) and (4), shows there were difficulties experienced in exercising the power of sale attending security interest acquired upon acquisition of the EBAs by AMCON. The amendment provides a departure from the regime of the old Section 34 which focused on vesting of security interest hitherto held by EFI in AMCON given that there is unclear language of reference to vesting rights of EBA in the previous AMCON Act. The amended Act expressly provided for vesting legal title to acquired EBAs and in the collateral securing such acquired EBA, and vesting power of sale, possession, management etc., to AMCON to exclusion of all other creditors notwithstanding that only equitable security exists in such collateral.

The Bill further provided AMCON’s special powers, to wit, RECEIVERSHIP POSSESSION & FREEZING ORDER (SEC 49 &50) BANKRUPTCY & WINDING UP PROCEEDINGS POWER TO APPOINT SPECIAL PROSECUTOR

SUBSEQUENT CHANGES IN THE 2019 AMENDMENT ACT

Section 4 inserted a new subsection (2) – (5) which indicates the need for the prior consent of the AGF to enforce/execute money judgment against AMCON and protection against interim or interlocutory attachment of AMCON’s funds in any bank. Section 12 also has a new subsection (2) which introduces the Certificate of Judgment as a registrable instrument. Section 21 now has a new subsection (1) which vests the FHC with exclusive jurisdiction to try criminal offences under the Act.

Additionally, to confirm its financial commitment to the proposed Banking Sector Resolution Cost Fund, the Federal Government through the Central Bank of Nigeria, will contribute at least the sum of N50, 000, 000, 000.00 (Fifty Billion Naira) on an annual basis.

This amounts to approximately N 750, 000, 000, 000.00 (Seven Hundred and Fifty Billion Naira) over the tenor of fifteen (15) years. This step no doubt ensures that the proposed Banking Sector Resolution Cost Fund has available funds to meet its obligations as and when due. Furthermore, the amended Act recognizes the drive to strengthen the capabilities of AMCON, and it imposes an annual levy in an amount equal to fifty (50) basis point of the EFI’s total assets on ??.

The Effect AMCON Act has on the Nigeria Capital Market. The aftermath of the global financial meltdown and the Nigerian Banking crisis saw the Exchange’s All share index (ASI) drop from a peak of about 66, 000 points in March 2008 to less than 22, 000 points by January 2009, wiping out over N 8 trillion (or around 70 percent) of the total capitalization of the Exchange within this period.

As a consequence of the above, a number of stock broking firms had no-performing margin loans, which consequently were acquired by AMCON as EBA’s from various EFI’s in line with Section 5(e) of the AMCON Act.

AMCON purchased these margin loans from the EFI’s for about N 42.6billion but the value of the underlying assets or collateral was worth about N19.6 billion. In furtherance of AMCON’s clean-up of the banking sector, AMCON exercised its powers under Section 6(5) of the AMCON Act and offered forbearance of about N22.6 billion on the margin loans of eighty four (84) stock broking firms.

The forbearance has enabled the capital market regain some of its vibrancy which will ultimately have a positive impact on the wider economy.

Furthermore, in line with its powers on Section 6(a) of the AMCON Act, AMCON issues bonds and other debt instruments as consideration for the acquisition of EBA’s. The tranches were listed on the Exchange with a total face value of N 1.7billion.

The AMCON Act has also created the enabling environment for the trade in bonds offered by AMCON, investment securities with collateral and securities lending activities. The Exchange notes that securities lending is a key initiative to deepen the Nigerian Capital Market.

Furthermore, Clause 21(a) of the Guidelines for the operations of the Asset Management Corporation of Nigeria (15 November 2010) recognizes that trading in Managed Assets should be carried out on the floor of the Exchange.

AMCON has made a significant impact in the Nigeria Capital Market. A breakdown of the top (5) Sectors in which EBA’s originate from and which represents 75.35% of all EBA’s purchased by AMCON shows that the capital market accounts for 17.93% which is the third highest sector. Others are Oil and Gas (27.23%), General Commerce (18.49%), Manufacturing (6.24%) and Finance and Insurance (5.47%).

Conclusion

The stringent provisions of the Act is a welcomed idea as the increased rate of indebtedness and debt profile is affecting the economy. The gains of the Bill cannot be overemphasized as AMCON will have a source of funds to meet its obligations under the AMCON Act. There is a need to revamp the culture of diligent liquidation of loan facilities granted as at when due to saving our economy from total collapse as spearheaded by this AMCON Amendment Act, 2019.

Definition of Terms/Acronyms

Amendment: A minor change or addition designed to improve a text, piece of legislation, etc.”an amendment to existing bail laws”

AMCON –Asset Management Corporation of Nigeria

EBA – Eligible Bank Assets

EFI – Eligible Financial Institution

CBN – Central Bank of Nigeria Notes

The NSE’s Perspective on the AMCON Amendment Bill, February 18, 2014 AAA Chambers – The Revised AMCON Debt Recovery Approach vis-à-vis The AMCON Special Powers- A Critical Review of AMCON Amendment Act 2019, 17 March 2020

0

PLEA BARGAIN UNDER THE NIGERIAN CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM

BRIEF OVERVIEW OF PLEA BARGAIN IN NIGERIA

The commission of crime activates the Nigerian criminal justice system and sets in motion the arrest of offender, investigation of crime and subsequent prosecution. In this era of technology with the attendant consequence of increased cybercrime, the law has fashioned a veritable tool for remorseful defendants to obtain certain concessions, within the ambit of our criminal jurisprudence. This instrumentality of the law is called Plea bargain.

WHAT IS PLEA BARGAIN?

This is an agreement between the prosecutor and a defendant who pleads guilty to a lesser charge or to one of multiple charges in exchange for a more lenient sentence or a dismissal of the other charges. In other words, it is an agreement in a criminal trial in which a prosecutor and a defendant arrange to settle the case against the defendant on terms accepted by the prosecutor, which terms are premised in the interest of justice, public interest, and public policy.

TYPES OF PLEA BARGAIN AGREEMENT

Theoretically speaking, there are basically three types of plea bargain agreements namely:

1. CHARGE PLEA BRAGAIN: it is a situation where the prosecutor agrees with the defendant to press a lesser charge than the one originally filed against the defendant.

2. COUNT PLEA BARGAIN: this arises where the accused person agrees to plead to one or fewer number of charge counts as filed by the prosecution in exchange for a concession.

3. SENTENCE PLEA BARGAIN: this has to do with pleading guilty to a charge for an exchange of a promised lenient sentencing. Here, the prosecutor need not reduce the charges or count charge filed against the defendant, rather, the prosecution would, based on the agreement of parties, recommend a lighter sentencing of the defendant.

The consent of the prosecutor and the defendant or his representative must be expressly obtained before a plea bargain agreement can be reached. It is important to note that there is no strict dichotomy between these types of plea bargain. This is because whichever approach/type is opted for, the end result is that the defendant is likely to get a lighter sentence for the offence he has committed in an exchange for the plea of guilty.

PARTIES TO A PLEA BARGAIN AGREEMENT

1. The prosecutor

2. The defendant

3. The court

4. The victim against whom the crime was committed (although not often the case)

PLEA BARGAIN UNDER THE NIGERIAN CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM

The doctrine was imported from the American criminal justice system into our corpus juris.

The regulatory frameworks that initially introduced this concept in Nigeria are the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (Establishment, etc) Act and the subsequent Administration of Criminal Justice Law of Lagos State. Section 14(2) of the EFCC Act provides as follows: subject to the provisions of section 174 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (which relates to the power of the Attorney-General to institute, continue, takeover or discontinue any criminal proceedings against any person in any court of law), the Commission may compound any offence punishable under this Act by accepting such sums of money as it thinks fit, exceeding the amount to which that person would have been liable if he had been convicted of that offence.

The expansive and elaborative provision of section 76 of the ACJL provides that Notwithstanding anything in this Law or any other law, the Attorney-General of the State shall have power to consider and accept a plea bargain from a person charged with any offence where the Attorney- General is of the view that the acceptance of such plea bargain is in the public interest, the interest of justice and the need to prevent abuse of legal process.

The above statutory provisions institutionalized the practice of plea bargain in Nigeria and formed the basis of the similar provision in Administration of Criminal Justice Act. The provision allows the defendant to plead guilty to lesser offences than the offences charged and guarantees speedy dispensation of justice.

ADVANTAGES OF PLEA BARGAIN

1. It serves as one of the tools used in the expedient disposition of criminal trials

2. It serves as a case management strategy

3. One of the usefulness of plea bargain is that it not only creates an avenue for punitive justice, in some instances it also incorporates the concept of restorative justice by placing the victim back to the position they would have been.

4. Plea bargain agreements may give you exponentially less severe penalties than a conviction at trial.

5. It is cost efficient

WHEN TO ENTER A PLEA BARGAIN

In plea bargain, during the course of negotiation, both parties must make compromises aimed at reaching an achievable agreement. A defendants’ knowledge of his chances of victory at trial is often the key to his decision to enter a plea bargain. It is always advisable to opt for an experienced criminal defense attorney who can help such defendant to make this critical but strategic decision. It is always safer to know what a defendant is bargaining for.

In practice, after the plea agreement has been reached by the prosecutor and Defendant, the Prosecuting officer will obtain the requisite internal approval and file a charge or count in a court of competent jurisdiction. The next phase involves the judiciary to accept the plea bargain agreement. After the matter is charged to court, the Defendant will be required to plead guilty to the counts or charges as agreed in the plea bargain arrangement. Thereafter, the prosecutor and the Defendant’s counsel will inform the court of the plea bargain arrangement pursuant to which the court will convict the defendant bearing in mind the circumstances of the plea bargain arrangement already entered by the parties.

Though plea bargain, as in all legal tools, is not without some concerns, it is believed that utilizing the services of an experienced crisis manager and criminal defence attorney would dispel these fears and ensure that the strategy is deployed in deserving circumstances.

Plea bargain has been successfully employed in high profile criminal cases as well as other criminal cases by legal experts in criminal defence litigation.

CONCLUSION

It is time for stakeholders in the Administration of criminal justice system to fully embrace this invaluable legal tool with its overwhelming advantages to the administration and dispensation of justice. It is without doubt that securing the services of an experienced criminal defense lawyer to mitigate the adverse effect of a defendant’s punishment in deserving circumstance, remains the right approach. The extent of the leniency of a defendant’s punishment lies solely in the negotiation skill and capacity of a sound criminal defense attorney and seasoned crisis manager.

0

NEWS UPDATE – CHINA CREATES ITS OWN DIGITAL CURRENCY

By: Nneka Oduada Eze Esq.

INTRODUCTION

The Chinese economy, which is one of the most powerful and well advanced economies in the world, is in the forefront of cashless policy payments. With the vantage positioning in the field of science and technology, China is now taking concrete steps to turn its bank notes and coins (legal tenders) into a computer code called the DIGITAL YUAN.

WHAT IS DIGITAL YUAN ALL ABOUT?

The Digital Yuan or Digital Currency Electronic Payment (DCEP) is the Chinese version of an electronic money or cyber cash. The ideology behind this novel initiative is the drive to jettison the traditional bank notes and coins for a digitalized currency and situating the Chinese economy to a viable alternative in global trade and commerce. The proposal for a Chinese digital currency was mooted in 2014 by the Peoples Bank of China (PBOC) and is expected to be in full circulation in China and to subsequently gain recognition and acceptance in the global market.

REASONS FOR THE INTRODUCTION OF THE DIGITAL YUAN

Some reasons have been advocated as basis for the digitalizing of the Chinese currencies, such as high cost of production and storage of the bank notes and coins, particularly, when they are worn-out. The whole process of destroying and re-making new currencies is heading towards the age of being outdated, especially with the level of technological advancement in place.

BRIDGING THE GAP IN THE FINANCIAL SECTOR

The digital Yuan, with its innovative features seeks to bridge yearning gaps in the traditional financial sector. In this era where cybercrime has sadly retained an evolving form of transnational crime and global concern, it is believed that the proposed implementation of the Digital Yuan will not only give the Chinese policy makers a great visibility into the inflow of money within China, it will also help in tracking illicit flow of funds within the space.

THE FUTURE IS DIGITAL

China has indeed taken a major flip into the future ahead of other countries. There is no doubt that within the shortest time, other countries will key into this tremendous idea of digitizing their currencies to reap the consequent benefits of ease of cross border and global trade. Since the future is technologically inclined, one will not be too surprised if paper notes (legal tenders) are put into a state of permanent abeyance.

0

JURISDICTION OF NATIONAL INDUSTRIAL COURT OVER MARITIME LABOUR MATTERS NOW UPHELD BY APPELLATE COURT

By: T.A.M Damiari Esq.

….. …..……Practice Manager

INTRODUCTION

On May 5, 2021, the Court of Appeal delivered judgment in The Vessel MT Sam Purpose (Ex MT. Tapti) & Anor v Amarjeet Singh Bains & 6 Ors (hereinafter referred as MT Sam Purpose) and held that by virtue of section 254C(1) of the Constitution, the National Industrial Court has jurisdiction to entertain matters relating to unpaid  crew wages.

FACTS

The Plaintiffs/Respondents at the Federal High Court sought several reliefs against the Defendants/Appellants bordering inter alia on crew wages, cost of Admiralty Marshall expenses, cost of arrest and detention of Vessel.
The Respondents also filed an exparte application seeking among others the arrest and detention of the vessel, MT Sam Purpose, pending the provision of a satisfactory bank guarantee to secure the Respondents’ claim. The Court after hearing argument of the Plaintiffs granted the exparte application by ordering thearrest of the MT Sam Purpose.
The Appellants upon entering conditional appearance, challenged the jurisdiction of the court to hear the suit and relied on section 254C(1) (a) and (k) of the constitution. The Trial court refused the Appellant’s application, leading to an interlocutory appeal to the Court of Appeal.
The Court of Appeal upheld the Respondents’ interlocutory appeal, set aside the order of arrest and struck out the suit for want of jurisdiction.

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF APPEAL

In upholding the Respondents’ interlocutory application, the Court of Appeal held that Section 254C(1) of the Constitution confers exclusive jurisdiction on National Industrial Court over maritime labour related matters, inclusive of crew wages. According to the Court, Section 2(3)(r) and 3 of the Admiralty Jurisdiction Act, which conferred similar jurisdiction on the Federal High Court, was void to the extent of its inconsistency with the Constitution whilst relying Section 1(3) of the Constitution.

IMPLICATION OF THE JUDGMENT

By this judgment, the National Industrial Court now has jurisdiction over labour matters involving appointment, condition of service, remuneration, and termination of employment of crew or seamen. Aggrieved seamen are now required to approach the National Industrial court to ventilate their grievances on unpaid crew wages.

The judgment was however silent on how a Plaintiff in an action in rem before the National Industrial Court would arrest a vessel as customarily done in admiralty matters for unpaid wages before the Federal High Court.

Undoubtedly, the judgment has raised concerns amongst maritime lawyers, workers and stakeholders, with some calling for a law review and others calling for vesting of concurrent jurisdiction on both courts on this narrow compass. It is now incumbent on the apex court, upon appeal of the matter, to lay this lingering issue to rest to ensure stability in the sector.

1 13 14 15 16